Campaign against Attempts to ‘Islamize’ Bible

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Fears are arising that missionary groups are seeking to “Islamize” the Bible by altering references to God as “Father” and to Jesus as the “Son” when translating the holy book into languages in Muslim-dominated parts of the globe.

The issue has been raised by Biblical Missiology in the U.S., after translations by the missionary groups Wycliffe Bible Translators, the Summer Institute of Linguistics and Frontiers removed or modified terms that may be offensive to Muslims.

An Nahar daily said Wednesday that Lebanese priest George Hosni, who hails from Zghorta, has also been spearheading the campaign against such translations.

Biblical Missiology has issued a petition stating that Wycliffe and the others “are producing Bibles that remove Father, Son and Son of God because these terms are offensive to Muslims.”

One example can be seen in an Arabic version of the Gospel of Matthew produced and promoted by Frontiers and SIL.

It changes Matthew 28:19 from “baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit” to “cleanse them by water in the name of Allah, his Messiah and his Holy Spirit.”

The Presbyterian Church of America has also criticized the issue, saying in a report drafted by a study team that “footnotes, parentheticals and other paratextual comments may be used to explain the biblical and theological riches of Scripture, while never subverting the important truths embedded in the biological contours of Scripture’s words.”

The PCA will discuss the study’s findings at its annual meeting in June.

But after numerous appeals were rejected, the online petition was launched calling for an end to the translations.

Comments 6
Missing servant-of-jesus 30 May 2012, 16:22

well done baba Georges :)

Default-user-icon Darwish (Guest) 30 May 2012, 19:42

Although the Christians have the full right to complain about their faith formulas being altered in translations, I think they must get over the fact that a human being who lived in antiquity is the son of a god in the literal meaning... Jews and Muslims and secular alike find the idea silly, naive and a myth similar to pagan myths that Christians based their religion upon but now they laugh at and do not buy anymore... The label "prophet" as in an Israelite prophet or prophet of Islam can be explained as a mortal human who was believed to enlightened by a sort of divine inspiration and in that respect the concept is much safer than a god coming to earth in the form of a man who is not so perfect and not so consistent in his sayings and actions (as per the Gospels)...The prophet label, although not scientific or historical, can survive time in an easier way compared to the god incarnate idea...

Default-user-icon Guest (Guest) 31 May 2012, 13:19

1. so what if Jews, Muslims and secular alike find the idea silly; doesn't prove the idea is not the truth,
2. Christians don't laugh at the idea; if they do then they are not Christians,
3. I prefer to the truth than a "safer" idea, even if the truth might sound silly,
4. I am sure we can all find silly ideas in any religion or atheism.

Default-user-icon Darwish (Guest) 31 May 2012, 18:15

Truth? What proof do you have for claiming the truth other than your faith? A faith inherited from your parents does not automatically equal truth. Also this does not mean the other religions have the truth or those who translate the bible to match their vision of the story have any truth whatsoever. No one should blindly believe in supernatural stories coming from primitive times where human education was almost 1%... No religion or book of faith contains truth. So yes, the Christians have the right to object a translation that does not match their classic theology but that does not mean they have the truth in their version of the story and in their books or that the others are tarnishing it with the translation...

Default-user-icon Heather (Guest) 30 May 2012, 22:33

Well done good and faithful servant, Georges!

Default-user-icon Polish interpreter (Guest) 01 June 2012, 16:29

Fantastic!!