Pillay Says Enough Evidence to Charge Syria's Assad

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

There is enough evidence to bring human rights charges against Syrian President Bashar Assad over his crackdown on protesters, U.N. rights Chief Navi Pillay said in comments broadcast Wednesday.

In an interview with the BBC broadcast Wednesday but recorded earlier, Pillay said the president's role as commander of the security forces left him responsible for their actions during the unrest.

She also highlighted what she said was the regime's systematic targeting of children.

The Syrian army's use of heavy weapons against civilians in densely populated areas was a crime under international law, said Pillay.

"Factually there's enough evidence pointing to the fact that many of these acts are committed by the security forces, (and) must have received the approval or the complicity at the highest level," she said.

"President Assad could simply issue an order to stop the killings and the killings would stop...," the U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Pillay told the BBC.

"So this is the kind of thing that judges hearing cases on crimes against humanity will be looking at on command responsibility."

Pillay also spoke of evidence she had seen that the regime was systematically targeting children in its bid to stamp out resistance.

Hundreds of children had been detained and tortured, said the South African lawyer.

"It's just horrendous."

Pillay said the U.N. Security Council now had enough reliable evidence to warrant a referral to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

"There is no statute of limitations so people like him can go on for a very long time but one day they will have to face justice," she said, referring to Assad.

The BBC interview with Pillay was broadcast on Wednesday but recorded before Damascus reportedly accepted the peace plan set out by U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan, a development greeted with skepticism by the West.

Syrian forces on Wednesday launched fresh attacks on rebel bastions as U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon urged Assad to immediately implement the U.N.-Arab League peace plan.

At least 21 people were killed as Syrian forces backed by tanks attacked the central town of Qalaat al-Madiq and other areas Wednesday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

The U.N. says the conflict has already claimed more than 9,000 lives in the past year.

Comments 7
Default-user-icon Murad (Guest) 29 March 2012, 14:03

Let's be clear about one thing. This "systematic" targeting of children is not true. They're trying to make it look like children are part of the protest movement for "freedom" but let's remember that the government is not the one making children come home straight from school or sleep by 8pm. If children were really protesting for freedom, they'd be protesting against their own parents.

Default-user-icon The Truth (Guest) 29 March 2012, 22:16

The whole revolution started when children in Daraa were arrested for doing graffiti on the walls against the regime also children have been systematically captured and tortured and executed and returned to their families as a warning. There is definitely systematic targeting of chidlren.

Missing servant-of-jesus 29 March 2012, 15:06

'how can you keep order without killing a few thousands?'
Every person who has killed (whatever side they are on) will be held accountable in front of God for every life he has taken. And every person who justifies the killing of any person (whatever side they are on), will be held accountable too!
I would not want to be in their shoes on the day of judgment.
Lord have mercy...

Default-user-icon Soledado (Guest) 29 March 2012, 16:01

Is this the same Pillay who dared NOT charge Israel, the most criminal nation-of-the-filthy on the face of the earth, with crimes against humanity? No wonder people take such Pillays seriously.

Thumb jcamerican 29 March 2012, 16:59

How about Bush? Or Obama? International court doesn't apply to them. They are immune. Didn't Israel severed relation with this organization because they wanted to investigate the settlements.

Default-user-icon The Truth (Guest) 29 March 2012, 22:21

Except the opposition started with peaceful protests and the response from the government was attack by military, security and armed thugs. It wasn't until months later that the opposition began arming itself. Also the opposition doesn't have artillery and can not destroy whole neighborhoods like the government is doing.

There might be cases of human rights violations by the opposition but they are tiny compared to the government's annihilation of whole families and neighborhoods and torture. It's like comparing an ant to an elephant.

Missing jimbei 30 March 2012, 02:02

Man come on... Are you honestly comparing what the regime has done to what the opposition has done? I am not saying that the opposition hasn't retaliated but what has been done by the regime far surpasses the damages done by the opposition. Im sure there is a humane side in you that is capable of seeing that.