Consensus on Hybrid Electoral Draft Law Far-Fetched

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Consensus between rival parties on a hybrid electoral draft-law was on Wednesday not looming on the horizon after reports said that Hizbullah rejected it and talks between March 14 opposition officials and the Progressive Socialist Party slowed.

Hizbullah informed Speaker Nabih Berri that it rejected the hybrid proposal, which a team of experts and MPs from the opposition al-Mustaqbal movement and the centrist Progressive Socialist Party are seeking to draft, al-Liwaa daily reported.

The hybrid draft-law combines the winner-takes-all and proportional representation systems but the main obstacle to a deal among the different blocs lies in the division of districts.

Al-Liwaa said relations between Berri and PSP chief Walid Jumblat, who were coordinating on the proposal, have also cooled over converging viewpoints on a parliamentary session to approve the Orthodox Gathering proposal which has been approved by the joint parliamentary committees despite the rejection of al-Mustaqbal, the PSP and the March 14 opposition alliance's independent Christian MPs.

Berri has been procrastinating on inviting for a General Assembly to give the rival blocs more time to reach consensus on a draft-law.

But the speaker's insistence to elect half of the MPs under the winner-takes-all system and the remaining half under the proportional representation system has thwarted the joint attempt of al-Mustaqbal and PSP to seek the consensus of the rest of the factions.

The PSP is insisting on allowing 70 percent of candidates to be chosen under the first system and 30 percent under the second system, An Nahar daily said.

Minister Wael Abou Faour, who is close to Jumblat, met with Berri on Tuesday in an attempt to resolve the differences.

Their meeting came a day after al-Mustaqbal bloc MP Fouad Saniora visited Jumblat for the same purpose.

“The discussions between al-Mustaqbal and the PSP are focusing on a salvation plan that should receive consensus,” sources close to Saniora told An Nahar.

Independent opposition lawmaker Butros Harb justified the slowed talks among the different factions, by saying they were waiting for the March 21 cabinet session that will discuss the establishment of the authority that will oversee the polls before taking any action on a vote law.

“They are waiting to see the government's decision because it will set the fate of the elections and the call for holding them based on the 1960 law,” he told An Nahar.

President Michel Suleiman and Prime Minister Najib Miqati have signed a decree calling for the elections to take place based on the 1960 law that was used in the 2009 elections.

Their call have drawn the ire of the March 8 majority coalition which has totally rejected the law.

Comments 8
Missing ArabDemocrat.com 13 March 2013, 09:22

"Hizbullah informed Speaker Nabih Berri that it rejected the hybrid proposal" No further comment is necessary.

Thumb mckinl 13 March 2013, 09:58

"Consensus on Hybrid Electoral Draft Law Far-Fetched"

And ... it was always far-fetched. Consensus, meaning all parties were to agree, was always a non-starter. Which party is going to agree to take fewer seats?

Lebanon is a small country and all the parties know where their votes are and how many votes they have from whom. The parties were always going to gerrymander the system to their best interests.

The best representation is the one district winner take all under the gathering plan. Those opposed should accept the plan on one condition: That there be a complete census of all Lebanon taken and implemented next election.

With a complete census of all of Lebanon then there can be talk of of some redistricting according to the census whereby the voters, not the parties, are taken into consideration. Until there is a complete census there will constant gamesmanship but never a consensus.

Missing ArabDemocrat.com 13 March 2013, 16:35

Agreed on one condition - that the Hizb stops behaving as an independent actor, submit the decision of peace and war to the government and if elected government demands, hand over its weapons.

Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 13 March 2013, 10:44

we repeat:no senate election and no presidential elections till we have a clear outcome of bilad elham embroglio.
N.B. sykes picot #2 being drawn.

Thumb mckinl 13 March 2013, 11:50

Could you elaborate on your hypothesis ?

Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 13 March 2013, 13:13

the fate of election depends on the fate of damascus regime and timing is crucial,the longer it is , more radicalism we will endure...and more refugees we will have.
as for sykes picot #2: all geographical borders of the region will be altered to become religious borders: sunni shia druze kurd...battikh..meaning another 500 years backward,and all favouring israel and securing its borders...BTY ,the last TV show of hassan, did u hear anything about israel? NO,becose israel and the "shia" will have the same common ennemy,guess who?..that is only one ingredient of the tabbouleh coming.....jumblat and the kurds...the sunnis and turkey..the chritian and tango...lahm b'ajin.

Default-user-icon Remando Sortamby (Guest) 13 March 2013, 15:35

Mafia Hariri and Mafia Joumblat do not give any consideration to the Christians or anyone other than their own! They only want servants not equals, and this is why the dismantling of these mafias has finally begun. Decent Lebanese, REJOICE.

Missing saynotoreligion 13 March 2013, 18:03

Orthodox Law...welcome to the 1920s!!