Obama Orders Airstrikes in Syria for First Time to Destroy IS

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Opening a new military front in the Middle East, President Barack Obama authorized U.S. airstrikes inside Syria for the first time Wednesday night, along with expanded strikes in Iraq as part of "a steady, relentless effort" to root out Islamic State extremists and their spreading reign of terror.

"We will hunt down terrorists who threaten our country, wherever they are," Obama declared in a prime-time address to the nation from the White House. "This is a core principle of my presidency: If you threaten America, you will find no safe haven."

Obama announced that he was dispatching nearly 500 more U.S. troops to Iraq to assist that country's besieged security forces, bringing the total number of American forces sent there this summer to more than 1,500. He also urged Congress anew to authorize a program to train and arm Syrian rebels who are fighting both the Islamic State militants and Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Obama's plans amounted to a striking shift for a president who rose to political prominence in part because of his early opposition to the Iraq war. While in office, he has steadfastly sought to wind down American military campaigns in the Middle East and avoid new wars — particularly in Syria, a country where the chaos of an intractable civil war has given the Islamic State space to thrive and move freely across the border with Iraq.

Speaking on the eve of the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Obama's plans were also an admission that years of American-led war in the Middle East have not quelled the terror threat emanating from the region.

Obama insisted he was not returning U.S. combat troops to the Middle East. Even so, he acknowledged that "any time we take military action, there are risks involved, especially to the servicemen and women who carry out these missions."

"But I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil," he added.

The president's announcements follow a summer of deliberation at the White House over how to respond to the violent Islamic State militants. While administration officials have said they are not aware of a credible threat of a potential attack by the militants in the U.S., they say the group poses risks to Americans and interests across the Middle East. Officials are also concerned about the prospect that Westerners, including Americans, who have joined the militant group could return to their home countries to launch attacks.

In recent weeks, the militants have released videos depicting the beheading of two American journalists in Syria. The violent images appear to have had an impact on a formerly war-weary public, with multiple polls in recent days showing that the majority of Americans support airstrikes in both Iraq and Syria.

The U.S. began launching limited airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq earlier this summer at the request of that country's former prime minister. But Obama vowed that he would not commit the U.S. to a deeper military campaign until Iraq formed a new government that allowed greater participation from all sects, a step Iraqi leaders took Tuesday.

Officials said Obama plans to proceed with both the broader airstrikes in Iraq and the strikes in Syria without seeking new authorization from Congress. Instead, he is to act under a use-of-force authorization Congress passed in the days after 9/11 to give President George W. Bush the ability to go after those who perpetrated the terror attacks. Obama has previously called for that authorization to be repealed, but he has also used it as support for strikes against terror targets in Yemen and Somalia.

Obama compared the new U.S. mission in Iraq and Syria to the actions in Yemen and Somalia, campaigns that have gone on for years.

"This counterterrorism campaign will be waged through a steady, relentless effort to take out ISIL wherever they exist, using our air power and our support for partner forces on the ground," he said.

Obama is seeking authorization from Congress for a Pentagon-led effort to train and arm more moderate elements of the Syrian opposition. Even before his remarks, congressional leaders were grappling with whether to support that request and if so, how to get such a measure through the fractured legislature before the November elections.

The White House wants Congress to include the authorization in a temporary funding measure lawmakers are expected to vote on before adjourning later this month. Republicans have made no commitment to support the request and the House Republican Party has so far not included the measure in the funding legislation.

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the Nevada Democrat might opt to seek separate legislation.

While the CIA currently runs a small program to arm the rebels, the new version would be more robust. Obama asked Congress earlier this year to approve a $500 million program to expand the effort and put it under Pentagon control, but the request stalled on Capitol Hill.

Some of Obama's own advisers, including former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, pressed him to arm the rebels early in their fight against Assad. But Obama resisted, arguing that there was too much uncertainty about the composition of the rebel forces. He also expressed concern about adding more firepower to an already bloody civil war.

The White House announced Wednesday that it was also providing $25 million in immediate military assistance to the Iraqi government as part of efforts to combat the Islamic State.

The Treasury Department will also step up efforts to undermine the Islamic State group's finances. David Cohen, Treasury's undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, wrote in a blog post that the U.S. would be working with other countries, especially Gulf states, to cut off the group's external funding networks and its access to the global financial system.

The U.S. has been pressing allies in Europe, the Middle East and elsewhere to help with efforts to degrade the terror group.

France's foreign minister said Wednesday that his country was ready to take part in airstrikes against extremist fighters in Iraq if needed. And the German government announced that it was sending assault rifles, ammunition, anti-tank weapons and armored vehicles to Kurdish forces in Iraq fighting, breaking with Berlin's previous reluctance to send weapons into conflicts.

Secretary of State John Kerry is traveling to Saudi Arabia and Jordan this week. He first made a stop in Baghdad to meet with Iraq's new leaders and pledge U.S. support for eliminating the extremist group.

Comments 13
Thumb Tony.Farris 11 September 2014, 07:31

The finest most memorable speeches anoint victories. President Obama will always be remembered for his address to our nation announcing that we had killed Osama Bin Laden. He might have saved this night for a later speech announcing the defeat of ISIL in Iraq and Syria, and the death or capture of the criminals who beheaded two American journalists and the ones who committed atrocities these past several months. That is the kind of speech that would be a proud legacy. This one was mere promise. Hopefully it will not be an empty one. Or we'll wish he never made it.

Thumb liberty 11 September 2014, 07:45

none of this would be genuine and effective unless our administration openly supports efforts both politically and militarily that would lead to the demise and arrest of assad.

Thumb _mowaten_ 11 September 2014, 12:30

What a sad sight, assuming you guys are Arabs. Look at you cheering for foreign forces who have been bombing and destroying all the countries in this region. 2 million dead in Iraq alone were caused by the US between 1992 and now. It is their violence, their policies, the sectarian regime they installed after removing Saddam that created ISIS and the sectarian violence that is spreading from Iraq to Syria and now to Lebanon. And you cheer for more?

What makes you think that forceful regime change in Syria will have any different result than the one in Iraq? Always the same song, always the same pretexts (bringing democracy, freeing the people, WMDs...) always the same bitter awakening when we realize it was all lies, and yet some never learn.

You're either desperately stupid, or an agent in disguise.

Thumb _mowaten_ 11 September 2014, 12:37

IS is definitely evil and a threat for the region, but I do not trust the US intentions. It is our region, our land, our countries, our lives that are at stake, so it is our fight, not theirs. If they want to help us that would be welcome, but it should be under our terms, not theirs.

Missing lebanese_uae 11 September 2014, 07:53

did anybody noticed the 2 corns !! nice photographer !!!

Default-user-icon roukuz (Guest) 11 September 2014, 08:15

flamethrower will not let this speech go by without some serious debate. He will be on his first break of the day soon

Default-user-icon Mahdi Rostam Firdaus (Guest) 11 September 2014, 08:42

hahah! My cousin called me on my way to work and said I had to read your latest comment. I stopped at a gas station and used my phone to log on and read it. Well done flamethrower!

Default-user-icon lou williams (Guest) 11 September 2014, 08:45

another day another dollar as flamethrower embarks on yet another marathon day of posting.

Missing imagine_1979 11 September 2014, 08:57

Well still better than freeing lokman and nearly 500 of islamist friend by assad in 2011 (u know like when he freed shaker el abssi and sent it to us...), still better than buying oil from da3ech, still better than launching bombs and scod missils on fsa hold town while they r fighting da3ech on the ground...
No flame?
Time for ur chupachups man, start with a big one today :)

Thumb kanaandian 11 September 2014, 09:41

no us troops on the ground, just carpet bomb the BEASTS from air, clever.. i like this method. after the beasts are cleared we will exterminate assad and all the syrian refugees can return to syria. HA HA HA

Missing imperatrice 11 September 2014, 11:27

so let me get this straight
u hate ISIS, accuse us every day that we like head choppers and when we rejoice that someone is actually gonna do something to stop them you start mocking the initiative?

let's let crazy maniacs roll around in syria and iraq and Lebanese borders as long as bashar stays so does the empty promises for ur senile general

Default-user-icon + oua nabka + (Guest) 11 September 2014, 11:35

le nerf de la guerre , c'est l argent
and in order to kill the snake you have to go to the head or heads
and the heads here are the funders countries of these terrorists
god bless America and Lebanon

Default-user-icon AREALLEBANESE (Guest) 11 September 2014, 12:10

Thesw comments are disturbing you obviously have no idea whats been going on over here. ISIS are fucking rich and been not only murdering but kidnapping alot of people, there are a lot of hostages with them. And what you dont realize their forces are mostly boys and teenagers. Moreover the fact that you care more on destroying Assad than ISIS is exactly why America should stay the fuck out of this, and no ISIS doesnot pose a threat on America or the rest of the world. But believe me whoever funding them does. So wake up.