March 14 Mulling Not to Respond to Suleiman’s Invitation for Dialogue

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The March 14-backed opposition is mulling to reject President Michel Suleiman’s invitation for national dialogue over claims that Hizbullah’s arms are no longer acceptable.

An Nahar daily quoted March 14 decision-makers as saying that the opposition might not respond to Suleiman’s request given that it has already launched a campaign against Hizbullah’s weapons and the discussion of the issue during all-party talks is useless.

The army-people-resistance formula adopted by the government in its policy statement is baseless and totally rejected by March 14, they said.

Suleiman and the cabinet headed by PM Najib Miqati should engage in dialogue and not negotiate with the party on a mechanism that should disarm Hizbullah similar to the disarmament of other militias at the end of the Civil War in 1990, the officials told An Nahar.

The national dialogue should be based on the Taef Accord and Security Council resolution 1701 that call for ending the presence of illegitimate arms on Lebanese territories, the March 14 decision-makers said.

The opposition will suggest to Suleiman the participation of U.N. and Arab League officials in the dialogue and put only Hizbullah’s arms as a single item on the agenda of the talks, An Nahar said.

According to the March 14 proposal, the Shiite party should also announce its readiness to give up its arms.

Comments 7
Thumb shab 19 July 2011, 10:20

The Mossad party will never give up their arms. They are needed for killing Lebanese like they did May 2008

Default-user-icon Someone (Guest) 19 July 2011, 10:26

March 8 should not hold any dialogue with a bunch of corrupt baboons! ONE WAY TICKETS TO ALL YOU SAUDI BABOONS!

Default-user-icon Blue (Guest) 19 July 2011, 10:51

The biggest problem we have in Lebanon is that one sect(the shiites) have weapons they use to intimidate other sects/lebanese all under the pretext of resistance. No other sect in Lebanon is allowed to practice resistance. Hence, the name "Islamic Resistance". Moreover, it is not only limited to islamic, but to a specific sect within Islam, the shiite sect. Even, within the shiite sect, resistance is only open to those who believe in wilayat al faqih of hizbullah. The Murshid of this group has repeatedly said he will never lay down his arms. So, how can you have dialogue with some hard headed fanatic who thinks he has a mandate from God. Dialogue is carried out between equal parties. Until then, all efforts for dialogue remain futile.

Default-user-icon Gebran Sons for Cedar Revolution II in 2013 (Guest) 19 July 2011, 11:27

M14 has not learned its lesson and is getting more distant from Cedar Revolution’s objectives of freedom and democracy established by Lebanon’s youth movement that inspired youths from Tehran to Casablanca. You cannot negotiate with Miqati’s cabinet formed by criminal Assad’s regime and Basij; nor attend conference until Lebanon’s is freed from Hizb and Palestinian arms controlled by Ahmadinajad and Assad. Negotiating is like accepting partial withdrawal of Syrian troops in 2005. March 13 message was clear: all free Lebanese refuse Hizb arms. Only misguided supporters of Hizb and its useful idiots didn’t show up. But Shia supports Hizb like Syrians support Assad or Libyans support Khadafi. Hizb has taken Shia hostage making them stranger to their own culture primarily because of M14 mistakes for not incorporating youth movements and providing real alternative to Shia. Your main task is to incorporate youth and Shia democratic voices and provide vision for real transparent democracy.

Default-user-icon Gebran Sons for Cedar Revolution II in 2013 (Guest) 19 July 2011, 13:06

M14 has not learned its lesson and is getting more distant from Cedar Revolution’s objectives of freedom and democracy established by Lebanon’s youth movement that inspired youths from Tehran to Casablanca. You cannot negotiate with Miqati’s cabinet formed by criminal Assad’s regime and Basij; nor attend conference until Lebanon’s is freed from Hizb and Palestinian arms controlled by Ahmadinajad and Assad. Negotiating is like accepting partial withdrawal of Syrian troops in 2005. March 13 message was clear: all free Lebanese refuse Hizb arms. Only misguided supporters of Hizb and its useful idiots didn’t show up. But Shia supports Hizb like Syrians support Assad or Libyans support Khadafi. Hizb has taken Shia hostage making them stranger to their own culture primarily because of M14 mistakes for not incorporating youth movements and providing real alternative to Shia. Your main task is to incorporate youth and Shia democratic voices and provide vision for real transparent democracy.

Thumb thepatriot 19 July 2011, 13:14

Resistance this, resistance that... please refrain from calling those thugs resistants! They are fanatics, and businessman. That's what they are!

Default-user-icon Waddihom (Guest) 19 July 2011, 18:32

These losers have become creative in finding ways to self-destruct. They were insignificant, to begin with, considering that they got nothing in return for serving under the feet of an unqualified imbecile named Saad Don Haririoni, son of the filthiest Lebanese mafioso ever, who got the punishment that all mafiosos deserve.